Reviewed by: Shivam Gupta, HR Specialist at Pitch N Hire

An Australian business's applicant tracking system selection encompasses more than simply optimizing recruitment operations. It also encompasses business compliance, candidate experience, and the quality of decisions made in an increasingly competitive talent market.
An ATS, or Applicant Tracking System, is a software recruitment tool that manages an organization's hiring activities from candidate advertisement to onboarding. ATS systems automate resume collection and candidate tracking, and facilitate communication within a hiring team, among other compliance activities.
In Australia in 2026, recruitment systems will still be considered ancillary within the country's unique business environment. Issues of fair work law, state-specific employment legislation, compliance to the Australian Privacy Act with respect to candidate data, and recruitment system integration with Australian job boards (e.g., SEEK, Indeed Australia) are detrimental to a business's recruitment effectiveness combined with a country's skill shortages and remote work. It is no surprise, therefore, that most Australian businesses consider international, non-Australian ATS systems to be unsatisfactory.
The consequences of poor applicant tracking software choices are steep. Applicant tracking software has to be compatible with compliance issues. Failing this means litigation. Productivity can be lost. Candidate experience can be poor. These failures, individually, are bad. Together, they mean questionable hires that cost your business thousands of dollars. This guide has to be one of the best recruitment software guide for your business size, industry candidate, and your specific recruitment.
Let's see what each tracking software platform has to offer for investment.
Australia has been ranked using the acceptance of the terms of the platform's Evaluative Framework. Each platform has its strengths. What is deemed to be the best is based on the requirements of the organization.
Need to Compare ATS by your Company Size? You can compare your organization's size, team composition, and recruitment. Based on that, we will personalize your solution.
Category | ATS Platform |
| Best Overall ATS (Australia) | Greenhouse |
| Best ATS for Small Businesses | Employment Hero |
| Best ATS for Mid-Market Companies | JobAdder |
| Best ATS for Enterprises | Bullhorn |
| Best ATS for AI-Driven Hiring | Pitch N Hire |
| Best ATS for Compliance-Focused Hiring | Sentrient |
Recruiting software may affects your entire hiring process,that’s why we have developed clear assessment methodologies for each of the assessment software solutions on the list.
Understanding of Australia's Fair Work Act & Privacy Compliant Act: We focused on the compliant candidate communication templates, and the record keeping, auditing, and data hosting (at the Privacy Act compliant level) to understand which platforms are Claiming to know and comply with the Australian employment law, and Australian Privacy Act(s).
Usability for Australian Teams: We assessed ease of use, and the User's Interface (UI) with the Hiring Manager, Mobile User, and Time to produce new users.
Concerning the Australian Recruitment Ecosystem: Users were able to reach all local job boards, including SEEK, Jora, and Australia's Indeed, and xero, MYOB, and Employment Hero Payroll for Australian integrated payroll systems, which were extremely valuable.
Direct Pricing: Pricing offered in Australian dollars and flexible pricing options for Australian's SMEs to Enterprises was appreciated along with no hidden charges and direct pricing.
Reviewed Evidence: Australian HR independent communities, and G2 and Capterra were used to cross reference each platform for real marketing performance and claims.
Implementation & Support Quality: We evaluated onboarding durations, the Australian support team's time zones, training materials, and the handling of compliance questions.
This guide is the result of independent research and is designed to assist Australian businesses in evaluating ATS options. While some of the platforms included may offer partnership opportunities, all rankings are solely based on the analytical capabilities of the product, customer feedback, review surveys, compliance, and alignment with hiring within the Australian market. We do not charge for placement or ranking.
Many ATS that are designed with international customers in mind may appear to have all the features that Australian businesses need, but once implemented, the customer runs into a number of significant obstacles. Before committing, Australian businesses should consider these.
Excessive Complexity of the Fair Work Act: The Fair Work Act is one of the most thorough and complex employment laws in the world, and it regulates everything from advertising a position to termination. ATS's that are designed for the US or UK markets are often missing Enterprise Agreement templates, do not have Modern Award coverage, and do not have the redundancy consultation requirements. The absence of these features is not just annoying, it creates compliance risks.
State-Specific Employment Variations: Different Australian states and territories have their own additional employment criteria, especially in healthcare, education, and construction. Long service leave entitlements in Victoria differ from those in Queensland. NSW has certain regulations regarding portable long service leave for building and construction workers. Your recruitment software must operate within these regional restrictions, which international systems often overlook.
Privacy Act & Data Sovereignty: Australian Privacy Act, which governs the collection and usage of personal information, including data about candidates, may not align with the business practices of international ATS vendors. Australian ATS Vendors must comply with the Australian Privacy Act and provide Australian data hosting for ATS services, which international vendors do not provide.
Australian Local Job Board Integration: SEEK is the market leader in Australian recruitment, unlike international job boards. An ATS with SEEK integration is critical, for without it, clients must manually post jobs, enter data multiple times, and lose visibility on where candidates are in the funnel. The same is true for Indeed Australia, Jora, CareerOne, and niche job boards.
To summarize, an ATS designed for the U.S. market may do well in integrating with LinkedIn and Indeed.com, but it often disregards the Australian hiring market's compliance, integration, and other requirements.
Download Free ATS Compliance Checklist (Australia) - Ensure your recruitment process meets Fair Work requirements.
To better understand the applicant tracking systems on the Australian market, we have tailored our recommendations based on company size and particular needs instead of asserting only a single solution as the best. This way, we assist you in selecting systems better tailored to your company type.
Ideal for: 1-50 employees
Small Australian businesses require systems that are streamlined, affordable, and can be implemented without dedicating IT resources. Small Australian businesses have specific needs, and these systems strive to meet that need.
Top Recommendations:
Small business owners often report that the recruitment software available is either too simple (like a spreadsheet) or way too complicated (enterprise tools that are unnecessary). These systems are in the middle of the spectrum, providing professional tracking tools, compliance tools, and the potential for expansion, all without overwhelming the small teams.
Find the Best ATS for Your Small Business - get matched with the systems that work for your budget and team size.
Best for: Companies aiming for optimal efficiency and diminished time to hire.
AI and Automation in recruiting tech are changing the game. These tools screen resumes, match candidates, schedule interviews, and predict hiring success.
Top Recommendations:
At the high end, AI recruiting tools can reduce time to hire by 60% by screening resumes, scoring candidates on their skills, and predicting potential success. This is particularly valuable for employers dealing with large volumes of applications and tough skill gaps.
Compare AI-Powered ATS Platforms - Automation feature comparisons.
Best for: 50-500 employees
Mid-Market companies have their own set of problems. They are large enough to require advanced tools, but don't want the added expense of enterprise level complexity.
Top Recommendations:
Mid-market companies have a higher need for reporting than small business tools offer, plus the need for more advanced features like pipeline analytics and structured interview scorecards, because they usually have a number of hiring processes happening concurrently across different teams. These tools provide this level of sophistication.
Compare features relevant to growing Australian companies for mid-market teams to get ATS recommendations.
Ideal for: 500+ employees or recruitment agencies with several client accounts
Enterprise companies and staffing agencies need recruitment software that is more resilient to high volume hiring, complex processes, and advanced compliance requirements.
Top Recommendations:
These tools are created for controlling thousands of applications every month while providing the same business process in a standardized way. They offer the following features that smaller companies will never need: multi-entity management for agencies with many clients, advanced compliance processes for more regulated industries, white-labeling for agency ownership branding, and upper-level security with data governance.
Enterprise ATS Consultation - consult with experts on implementation and enterprise pricing.
Overview: Employment Hero is an Australian HR and recruitment software that is focused on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and combines applicant tracking, payroll, onboarding, and employee management into one system.
Best For: Australian small and medium enterprises (SMEs) who need an all-in-one solution for HR with automated compliance.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: From $6-8 Australian dollars, (AUD) per employee monthly, on the software, with recruitment features costing $10-12 (AUD) per employee monthly on the higher tier plans.
Compliance Level: High - purpose built for Australian employment laws.
Verified Reviews: G2 (450+ reviews), 4.4/5; Capterra (280+ reviews), 4.5/5. Users often mention the quality of compliance support and features for Australia.
Verdict: For Australian SMBs needing integrated HR and recruitment functionality, Employment Hero is the clear winner. For businesses that struggle with Fair Work compliance, the features alone validate the expense.
Compare This ATS With Others
Overview: JobAdder is a cloud-based recruitment software solution, built in Australia for mid-market companies and recruitment agencies covering the permanent and temporary hiring spectrum.
Best For: Recruitment agencies and growing Australian businesses.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing (AUD): User-based Custom pricing. For mid-market deployments, expect $150-300 AUD/user/month.
Compliance Level: High - includes Australian specific compliance features.
Verified Reviews: G2: 4.3/5 (180+ reviews), Capterra 4.4/5 (120+ reviews). Users seem to point out these two platforms as positives: Job board integration and features designed for agencies.
Verdict: For Australian recruitment agencies and mid-market companies needing more than entry-level platforms, JobAdder seems to be one of the primary contenders. Particularly strong for companies with a need to manage both permanent and contract recruitment.
Compare This ATS With Others
Overview: One the the most popular enterprise ATS in the US, Greenhouse offers a more structured approach to hiring, making it particularly attractive for Australian tech companies and larger firms.
Best For: For the larger enterprise companies and scale up firms who place a premium on recruitment quality and a data driven approach.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing (AUD): Custom pricing for enterprises. For the Australian customers the pricing typically starts in the range of $850-1,200 AUD. This is for the smaller enterprise deployments, and the pricing scales with the number of users and features.
Compliance Level: Medium - strong general compliance features but needs adaptations for Australia specific needs.
Verified Reviews: G2: 4.4/5, 3,000+ reviews, Capterra: 4.5/5, 800+ reviews. Reviews mention hiring analytics and process, as well as structuring.
Verdict: Greenhouse analytics and process tools are worth the premium for Australia analytics Australia tech firms and enterprise companies. Customers doing hundreds of hires per year will greatly benefit from the process optimization.
Compare This ATS With Others
Overview: Bullhorn is the dominant ATS for staffing and recruitment agencies worldwide, including Australia. It is tailored for agencies that handle both permanent and temporary recruitment.
Best For: Australian staffing firms and recruitment agencies that also manage client relationships.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: Agency-focused pricing usually begins around $400-600 AUD per user per month, with tiered pricing for larger groups.
Compliance level: High. Compliance with Australian staffing agency laws and payroll integration is included.
Reviews: 4.1/5 on G2 from 900+ reviews. 4.2/5 on Capterra from 500+ reviews. Agency users appreciate the rich feature set, despite the steep learning curve.
Verdict: Bullhorn is the leading agency management system for Australian recruitment firms with both temporary and permanent placement desks. The investment is warranted for agencies. Corporate recruiters should explore other systems, unless coordinating large scale contractor placements.
Compare This ATS With Others
Overview: Pitch N Hire is an AI-powered applicant tracking system that includes intelligent candidate matching and automated screening, and recruitment workflow automation with compliance that fits Australian requirements.
Best For: Organizations looking to use AI and automation to decrease time-to-hire while remaining compliant.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing (AUD): Starting around $80 to $120 AUD per month for small teams and $200 to $400 AUD per month for mid-market plans with complete AI features. Clearly defined tiers.
Compliance Level: Medium to High - includes compliance tracking features with custom settings for Australia.
Verified Reviews: 4.3/5 on G2 (150+ reviews), 4.4/5 on Capterra (90+ reviews). Users highlight the AI features and clear pricing.
Verdict: Australian businesses emphasizing automation and the use of AI for greater efficiency stand to benefit the most from Pitch N Hire. Most appropriate for small-to-medium and mid-market businesses wanting to make advancements in their recruitment processes without spending at an enterprise level.
Overview: HR Breezy is a user-friendly recruitment software that aims for small and startup businesses in Australia for facilitating streamlined processes and fostering collaboration.
Best for: Small teams using recruitment software with not a lot of applicant tracking components.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: Monthly pricing starts at around $200 for small teams (max 3 users) with transparent pricing that goes up to $500 for growing businesses.
Compliance Level: Medium, with a standard set of features for compliance and manual adjustments for Australian features.
Review rating: 4.4 G2 (over 600 reviews) and 4.5 on Capterra (over 300 reviews). Most reviews highlight the low cost and the user-friendly software.
Verdict: HR Breezy is a good option for small and startup businesses in Australia that want a simple solution to recruitment software.
Overview: Workable is one of the more widely used recruitment software platforms around the world and is now expanding into Australia. They offer strong sourcing and AI assisted Candidate matching as well as Job Posting Distribution.
Best For: Workable is suitable for small to mid sized businesses with a strong Employer Branding and Candidate Sourcing focus.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: Starting at $180 monthly for entry level plans. This goes up to and above $500 monthly for plans that include premium features and allow for larger teams.
Cost Level: Medium
Verified Reviews: 800+ Reviews on G2 for 4.6/5 and 400+ on Capterra with 4.5/5. Features and Sourcing Capabilities are the most noted. Overall features received appreciation as well.
Verdict: For Australian SMBs who have trouble with candidate sourcing, Workable offers the most value. Workable's job board distribution and sourcing tools provide justification for businesses operating in competitive talent markets.
Compare This ATS With Others
Overview: Sentrient is an Australian recruitment software provider, and its primary area of strength is in compliance-focused hiring for the healthcare, education and government sectors.
Best For: Sentrient is best suited for heavily regulated industries that require full, end-to-end compliance tracking and credentialing.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing (AUD): Pricing is customized to the individual organization's compliance needs and size. This typically falls in the range of $300-600 AUD per month, depending on the features and users.
Compliance Level: High - compliance features for regulated industries is best in class
Verified Reviews: 4.2/5 on G2 (80+ reviews), 4.3/5 on Capterra (50+ reviews). Users in healthcare and education appreciate the compliance features.
Verdict: Sentrient is best for Australian organizations in healthcare, education, and government where compliance is necessary. Features warrant premium pricing for specialized industries.
Knowing the pricing involved helps in developing realistic expectations in budget and ROI. ATS pricing in Australia is very broad, defined on features, size, and the vendors' place in the market
Feature | Pitch N Hire | JobAdder | Greenhouse | Employment Hero | Bullhorn |
| Fair Work Compliance | Yes | Yes | Partial | Yes | Yes |
| AI Matching | Yes | Partial | Yes | No | Partial |
| SMB Friendly | Yes | Partial | No | Yes | No |
| Pricing Transparency | Yes | No | No | Yes | No |
| Australian Job Boards | Yes | Yes | Partial | Yes | Yes |
| Agency Features | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Integrated Payroll | No | Partial | No | Yes | Partial |
| Advanced Analytics | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial | Yes |
| Mobile App | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Video Interviewing | Yes | Partial | Partial | No | Partial |
.
Some applicant tracking systems provide free versions, usually adequate for very small businesses, or those at very early stages of structured recruitment.
Advantages of free ATS systems include: No financial risk entailed, enables trial of recruitment software methodologies, and is adequate for businesses with infrequent hiring needs and facilitates a rudimentary process structure beyond spreadsheets.
Limitations include: Features are very basic (they usually allow only 1-2 activations of job postings at a time), compliance support is non-existent, functionality for Australia is not available, integration with job boards is nonexistent or very poor, candidate databases are capped to very low numbers, support is non-existent or very basic in the documentation.
Judgement: Free ATS systems are adequate for infrequent recruitment, but become limiting in short timeframes. Practically all Australian organizations surpass them in under a year.
This category is fitting small Australian firms with an annual headcount growth of 5-15.
What you get: Basic tracking of applicants and management of pipelines, along with job postings to main job boards (often with posting credits), basic collaboration tools for small hiring teams, basic email templates for communications, and mobile to candidate data.
Popular platforms: Breezy HR (starter plans), Workable (basic tier), and a number of overseas platforms with support in Australia.
Best for: Startups, small retail businesses, professional services firms with 20 or fewer employees.
This is the sweet spot for fast-growing Australian businesses that are looking for a professional level of recruitment that avoids enterprise level complexity.
What you get: Full tracking of applicants along with customizable workflows, integration of advanced job boards such as SEEK and Indeed Australia, management of candidate relationships, scheduling and coordination of interviews, basic compliance monitoring, and the analytics and reporting that go with it, as well as integration with HR and payroll systems.
Popular platforms: Employment Hero (premium plans), JobAdder (small team pricing), Pitch N Hire (full-featured plans), Workable (standard tier).
Best for: Mid-market companies (between 50 and 250 employees), growing start-ups, small recruitment firms, and businesses that hire 20 or more people in a year.
Enterprise level pricing reflects more sophisticated requirements such as more comprehensive functionality, higher user counts, and more sophisticated compliance and integration needs.
What you get: Unlimited users and job postings, sophisticated analytics and reporting dashboards, structured scorecards and methodologies for hiring, extensive compliance and auditing functionalities, dedicated account management and customer support, custom integration API access, enterprise security features, SSO, and whitelabeling for agencies.
Marketplace ATS: Greenhouse, Bullhorn, iCIMS, SAP SuccessFactors.
Ideal customer: Very large companies (500+ employees), recruitment agencies with high headcount, companies with multiple sites, companies operating in heavily regulated environments.
The advertised platform fee is only part of your total cost. Consider implementation fees: setup, data transfer, workflow config, and training usually are an extra 10-30% clause to your first year.
For ATS Integration: Connecting to the employee lifecycle (payroll, HRIS, background check) and other apps may add some tech resource or consultant drag.
Job Board Steps: Some ATS charge extra for postings on premium job boards (e.g. SEEK). If you're hiring actively, expect to budget AUD 200-500 for job board postings.
Training Costs: There is an opportunity cost in training hiring managers since there is an investment of time.
Routine operating Resources: High levels of support, more training, and ongoing tweaks will draw more of your in-house resources or pull in a consultant
Taking all of the above into account, a more realistic total cost of ownership is 1.5-2x the platform fee.
Calculation of ATS ROI For Your Business - Use the calculator to determine expenses, and the time savings you could attain.
Industries are affected by various recruitment hurdles. Let's see how we can align your industry with the most suitable platforms.
Main Considerations: Rapid hiring cycles, high market competition, ability to assess candidates' technical skills, the ability to assess candidates remotely, emphasis on employer branding.
Preferred Platforms:
Tech firms should focus on platforms that enhance the candidate's and the employer's experience, as leading technical talent looks at both sides of the hiring process.
Main Considerations: Credential verification, registration in the system, compliance to AHPRA, background and immunization checks.
Preferred Platforms:
Compared to most other industries, recruitment in the healthcare industry has more intricacies. Therefore, platforms with credential expiration tracking are more critical.
Main Considerations: licenses and certifications, skills-based, geographical and positional attrition, and engagement of blue-collar candidates.
Integrating systems you listed for recruitment are suitable for manufacturing companies as they will integrate with payroll and will be suitable for manufacturing employment structures.
Preferred Platforms:
Manufacturing companies have a strong need for SMS communication, as most candidates prefer texting over emailing. Many candidates are blue-collar workers, so an SMS communication platform is a plus.
Key Requirements: Client management, temporary and permanent separation, timesheet processing, margin tracking, and white labeling.
Preferred Platforms:
Recruitment agencies need completely different software than corporate hiring teams and generic ATS systems. These do not offer client management and billing integration or the temporary staffing processes that agencies need.
Key Requirements: Background screening integration, cultural fit assessment, structured interviewing, confidentiality, and compliance tracking.
Recommended Platforms:
Financial services firms often examine the structures, the rigor of the assessments, and the audit trails for compliance processes. Platforms with structured scorecards and analytics for the entire hiring process fit these needs.
Check ATS Options for Your Industry to get recommendations and implementation guides that include your industry, as well.
Choosing the right platform is only part of the challenge. Successful implementation will be the deciding factor as to whether your ATS solution delivers value or becomes an expensive collection of digital dust.
Week 1-2: Planning & Setup
Weeks 3-4: Configuration
Weeks 5-6: Data Migration & Testing
Week 7-8: Training & Launch
Ongoing: Platform Adoption & Optimization
For most Australian businesses, achieving basic functionality takes 4-6 weeks, after which 3-6 months are typically required for full optimization and adoption.
Mistake 1: Lack of stakeholder engagement. Implementing ATS software without input from hiring managers guarantees low adoption. Engage essential stakeholders in early stages of workflow engineering.
Mistake 2: Over-customization. Too much customization results in additional maintenance cost and complicated upgrades. Begin with standard workflows and customize only when it is truly warranted.
Mistake 3: Lack of Training. Assuming managers will "figure it out" will lead to workarounds and no usage. Provide trainings with defined scope and work of the role.
Mistake 4: Lack of change management. Technical implementation is successful when the organization does not. People avoid the "new" in favor of the old. The old ways will always remain. This is the "soft" side of implementation. Lack of training, ineffective communication, and premature celebration of wins.
Mistake 5: Poor data management from the start. Transferring dirty data, inconsistent job titles, and untamed tags lead to data silos. Set standards for data management before
By following these established strategies, you can ensure that your ATS will work for you.
Start with early wins: Begin with the role types that will generate the greatest volume. From there, you can showcase your gained efficiency. Success breeds adoption.
Make it worse than the old way: If your ATS creates more work than before methods, it won't be used. Simplify your workflows relentlessly.
Amplify adoption: Publicly praise the managers who are participants in using the system. This will create a snowball effect.
Integrate with current systems: The more your ATS integrates with existing systems (email, calendar, Slack), the less friction there will be for users when adopting the new ATS.
Actively support and monitor: The first 90 days are critical for support and monitoring. Provide the most active support during this time, and be ready to assist when people are having difficulty.
Collect feedback and respond: Regular feedback sessions with users indicate a willingness to respond to feedback and help resolve usability problems vs training issues.
Download our ATS implementation guide tailored for Australian businesses.
A. Various Australian applicant tracking systems are Pitch N Hire, Greenhouse, Ceipal, HireVue, and iCIMS. These systems offer automated resume scanning, candidate ranking, and hiring statistics. Compliance with Australian recruitment laws and regulations poses very little risk when utilizing these systems. Australian applicant tracking systems allow employers to easily screen resumes, synthesize applicant data, and initiate automated candidate-employee matching.
Automated interview scheduling tools from Pitch N Hire, JobAdder, Workable, Breezy HR, and Greenhouse are compliant with the Australia Job Act and the Fair Work Act. These systems are compatible with Google and Outlook calendars for scheduling.
A. Australian employers have the option to customize branded career pages using ATS systems such as JobAdder, Workable, Recruitee, Pitch N Hire, and Greenhouse. These systems allow the Australian employers to customize their branded career pages to better reflect their company's culture, values, and to consolidate their job postings on one page.
The remedy period is a time period where the parties have to reach an agreement. The mandatory subject of bargaining is the reason for reaching an agreement. During the remedy period you can not do a number of things. You cannot terminate workers. You also cannot dismiss employees. These are the main subjects of the remedy period.
For most Australian businesses, basic implementation takes about 4-6 weeks and includes the initial training, integration, configuration, and setup. However, it typically takes about 3-6 months to achieve full optimization and strong user adoption. In other cases, enterprise implementations with more complicated integrations and several locations may need an additional 3-6 months for the initial deployment. The timeline is mostly influenced by the complexity of the organization, the need for data migration, and the level of commitment to change management.
Recruitment agencies need corporate ATS systems that have specific additional features, which most do not have: client relationship management, different workflows for permanent and temporary recruitment, billing and timesheet functions, placement and margin tracking, white-labeling, and workflow functions. Bullhorn and JobAdder are examples of systems that cater specifically to agencies, while Greenhouse and Employment Hero target corporates and are missing essential agency functions. Applying the wrong category results in severe workflow friction.
Time savings are the biggest reason why ATSs are a good investment. For example, automated resume screening can reduce time spent on reviewing applications by 60-75%, using an ATS with an integrated job board can save 2-3 hours a week, automated communication with candidates gets rid of the need for manual follow-ups, and better teamwork can result in a 30-50% reduction in hiring lag. For a mid-market company like a company that makes 50 hires in a year, an ATS is typically justifiable if it saves 200-400 hours of recruiter time and time is more valuable than money. There is also economic benefit, though hard to calculate, for big improvements on hire quality and turnover, especially for companies at scale.
Selecting an ATS is a more involved process than looking at the price tag and checking reviews. A poor choice of an ATS can result in losing hiring quality, a bad candidate experience, noncompliance, and poor internal productivity. The huge selection of portals that claim to be #1 is non-informative. It does not help to make a choice.
Think about these considerations first.
The scale of your company and how many people you hire dictate how large and complex the system needs to be. Waste money on the wrong system that your company will outgrow in a year by selecting a system that is too high a level.
There is great variation in compliance requirements across industries. While healthcare and education deal with credentialing intricacies that retail does not, financial services need background screening integration that tech startups may not focus on.
The existing tech ecosystem also drives integration needs. For instance, companies that use Xero for payroll have different integration needs than companies that use MYOB or Employment Hero.
Your team's technical sophistication also dictates what platforms they will actually use. If your hiring managers don't use a feature-rich platform, it does not provide any value.
Budget realities include not just platform costs but also implementation, job board credits, training, and support costs.
Instead of managing this complex decision by yourself, use tailored expert advice for your specific Australian business needs.
Get Your ATS Recommendation Today